MANIFESTOS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA
The Industrial Sector
The industrial sector of Ghana has five
subsectors: mining and quarrying manufacturing, electricity generation and
distribution, water and sewerage and construction. The weak performance of Ghana’s
economy (3.9) according to ISSER (2016) was due to the weak performance of the
industrial sector. This clearly points to the fact that industry is a key
driver of Ghana’s economic growth and subsequent development.
Industry has been projected to be the
driver of Ghana’s economic growth process in 2017 and beyond. ISSER (2016)
projected that industry could drive Ghana’s overall economic growth to reach 7
and 8 percent GDP in 2017 and 2018. This outlook was based on several factors
prominent among which are the $498 million dollars
grant from the Millennium Challenge Corporation of US into the energy sector,
and increase in the volume of gas and oil.
Who is Promising What?
Going back into the recent history of
Ghana’s economic growth, Ghana recorded 14% growth in 2011 (IMF, 2015a). This
growth was propelled largely by the growth in the industrial sector. According to ISSER (2016) the growth in the
industrial sector in 2011 was driven by the procurement from local
manufacturing industries related to the oil sector and ready market for goods
and services. Given this background, it is no wonder the political parties are
promising so many things in the industrial sector.
(A) The flagship initiatives by the NPP
under industry include: (i) One factory one district (ii) Growth pole
industrial initiative and (iii) National Industrial Sub-contracting Exchange
for local suppliers of goods and services that industry needs.
Critique
One factory one district is overly ambitious promise.
Firstly, large market for the sale of
goods and services produced in Ghana is a great challenge facing the Ghanaian industrial
sector today. Do we have the domestic market to consume the larger part of all
the goods and services that will be produced by these factories? Can the
products meet the quality demanded by Ghanaians at the cheapest cost? Will the
new factories be export driven or import substitution? Has Ghana the raw
materials base to sustain continuous production of these factories? Can these
factories produce in large volumes to offset unit costs? These are critical
questions that were not clearly addressed in the manifesto. The question of
market is very important to the sustenance of jobs that may be created by these
factories. In fact, Honorati and Johansson de Silva (2016) posited that the
sustenance of Ghana’s job strategy is to boost internal demand and exports of
goods and services produced.
Secondly, the link between the one
district one factory policy and the next flagship initiative – anchor
industries – to serve as growth poles is blur. The growth pole concept in siting
industries is based on the type of industry, the natural resources that exist
in an area and the human capital available. Besides, the question of efficiency
in the performance of the yet to be established industries is equally
important. Here there would be the need for clusters of industries to be
formed, backed by innovativeness, entrepreneurship and training. Will the anchor industries serve as poles
along which there would be backward and forward dependence by the district
factories in the supply/demand chain?
Thirdly, the NPP intends to pursue a
consumer protection law from inferior goods, products and services. Will this
law enable these yet to be established factories produce quality goods to meet
the taste of Ghanaians and beyond? How does the support for young businesses
and start-ups relate to the one district one factory? Will it not become a game
of unevenly matched competitors?
Fourthly,
the link between the key subsectors of the industrial sector is not properly
linked under the industrialization section of the NPP manifesto. For instance,
for manufacturing to do well, there is the need for improved and consistent
supply of power. In fact, ISSER (2016) documents that the improved performance
of manufacturing in 2015 was due to power supply.
The sources of revenue and related
resources to undertake such a monumental venture need to be made clear. The
volume of Ghana’s exports have dwindled, the cedi has depreciated, oil prices
have fallen and tax revenues have also fallen short of the projected targets.
If it is to be financed through loans, will it not defeat the excessive borrowing
argument by NPP? If it is through public private partnership which strategic
investors are the targets?
(B) The NDC’s industrial policy in the
manifesto appears to be based on the philosophy of resource endowments of each
district. There are ten major areas it intends to cover: (i) An Integrated
Aluminum Industry (ii) Fertilizer Production (iii) Mineral Processing (iv) Steel
Mills (v) Glass, Bottle, Rubber and Ethanol Production (vi) Ceramics, Bricks
and Tiles (vii) Light Manufacturing (viii) Machine Tools (ix) Shipyard and Dry dock
(x) Agro-Industrialization.
Critique
The geographical contiguity of these
industries favour only a few areas in terms of spatial distribution. How do we
spread development to other areas of the country to stem the tide of
rural-urban migration? In any case, this policy direction only goes to
reinforce the urban bias hypothesis in terms of the spread of industries. What
about those areas of the country that are endowed with a large number of human
resource? Honorati and Johansson de Silva (2016) documented that there is “a
strong need for balance between job opportunities in urban and rural areas in
Ghana”(p. 123). The light manufacturing phase of industrialization lacks
specificity. Will it not be driven by the same resource endowment philosophy?
Where will the industrial estates be located? Will it help break the urban bias
hypothesis and ensure equity in terms of distribution?
In the manifesto it was mentioned that
there would be establishment of plants for glass and bottle-making in the early
part under industry only for the last part of industry to declare a conduction
of a feasibility study into Abosso Glass factory to ascertain its viability.
Putting the cart before the horse?
The manifesto also argued for agro-based
on-farm industries. In contrast, there is a move away from this strategy. Given the nature of the Ghanaian economy,
many citizens have found “better” jobs by steering clear of on-farm jobs to
off-farm self-employment (Honorati and Johansson de Silva, 2016). They argued that the off-farm sector employed
2.6million workers between 1991 and 2012 and created 200,000 jobs per year. The
strategy should rather focus on structural transformation of the Ghanaian
economy through formalization. This is what the many self-employed informal
entrepreneurs need.
Re-engineering of the domestic demand
for goods and services is also important for sustainability of these industries
and stimulation of the domestic economy and the subsequent growth that is
needed. In fact, the linkage to the domestic demand and market is missing under
the industrial sector of the manifesto.
Are there significant
differences?
The difference in the industrial policy
between NPP and NDC is an issue of eclectic versus specificity on one hand
linkage and non-linkage on the other.
Implications for Growth
and Development
NPP
There appears to be a synergy between
the third flagship industrial initiative of NPP and what ISSER (2016)
identified to propel the growth of Ghana’s economy. If
NPP wins and fine-tunes the first two innovations carefully and get the linkage
right, the growth in 2017 and 2018 as mentioned by ISSER is likely to be
triggered. This positive outlook
is based on the shopping mall and big super markets syndrome currently developing
in major cities in Ghana, which are likely to serve as markets for import
substitution. Secondary, there may be
the need for a moral suasion for Ghanaians to change their taste for foreign
goods and exploration of the ECOWAS market. If NPP is able to do this, the
challenge of demand for goods and services would be resolved. Spare parts
dealers were able to lower the prices of their goods to enable former president
Kufour succeed, so it could be done. Thirdly, these yet to be established
factories/industries must also produce to meet the standards required in terms
of quality of their goods.
Ghana’s technical schools/polytechnics
are now more of Arts degree institutions. Are we going to import the middle
manpower needed for these industries? To answer this question, NPP intends to
“establish apprenticeship and skills development centres to train skilled
labour force for specific industrial sectors”. Inasmuch as NVTI is engaged in
such skills development the current concept of NPP calls for paradigm change in
the curriculum of such institutions or at best new curriculum for the centers
that will be established.
NDC
Atuabo gas and its utilitarian value for
the fertilizer factory proposed by NDC bring to the fore, the efficiency
argument in blending factors of production. This can lower the production cost
of fertilizer and the downstream effect on farmers is colossal. There is a clear
link between power supply and the subsector industries NDC wants to undertake
in its manifesto. Again, shipbuilding and repair is a huge industry that can
generate forward and backward link within the domestic industrial sector and
connection to the global market. In fact, ‘job opportunities that reduce
poverty, connect the local economy to global markets’ Honorati and Johansson de
Silva, 2016).
Like NPP, NDC also intends to solve
their middle manpower conundrum through the convention of polytechnics into
technical universities. However, re-orientation of the curriculum with focus on
the core mandate of developing middle manpower is needed. Though many of the
proposed industries are concentrated in a few areas in Ghana there is an
element of prioritization and specific focus on key industries. This will make
implantation relatively easier.
Conclusion
The true measure of viability of any
policy is when the felt needs of the people are addressed in the face of the
quantum of projected revenue and related resource inflows, and the opportunity
costs therein. Both parties (NDC & NPP) did not attach any projected inflow
of revenue and related resources to undertake their respective projects. In
deed, in the face of NPP’s promise to reduce corporate tax, remove import duty
and abolish the special import levy, the expected levels of tax gain may fall,
raising the question of where to get the funds to undertake the projects and
programmes. On the other hand, NDC’s penchant for borrowing at high costs to
undertake its projects is likely to create an albatross around the neck of the
present and future generations if it is not checked.
Bibliography
Honorati, M
and Johansson de Silva, S (2016). Expanding Job Opportunities in Ghana.
Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0941-5. License:
Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Institute of Statistical Social and
Economic Research (2016). The State of the Ghanaian Economy 2015. ISSER, Accra University
of Ghana.
International
Monetary Fund, IMF (2015a), “Navigating Headwinds”, Regional Economic
Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa, April 2015. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/2015/afr/eng/pdf/sreo0415.pdf.
National
Democratic Congress 2016 Manifesto.
New Patriotic
Party 2016 Manifesto.
No comments:
Post a Comment